THIS is gross. Not only is it wrong for these workers to be exposed to these chemicals their entire shift, it is wrong for the USDA to be an advocate for the American poultry industry and so put the American public at risk by promoting the industries desire for faster chicken processing lines with fewer government inspectors and a greater reliance on chemical spray washes. If the USDA gets their way the chicken we buy will include sides of shit, guts and bacteria. What to do? Check out these articles from +Mother Jones and +Daily Kos and e mail your Representative and Senators and DEMAND they stop the USDA from implementing these "filthy poultry" rules.....
| Wed Apr. 30, 2014 3:00 AM PDT
Think you have it tough at work? Imagine taking a post at a
factory-scale poultry slaughterhouse. Chicken carcasses whiz by at the
rate of 140 per minute, requiring repetitive hand motions with sharp
knives. Then there's the caustic odor of chemical sprays and washes—practices the industry has resorted to in recent years as a way to control bacterial pathogens like salmonella.
The US Department of Agriculture, which inspects the kill line at these plants, has been brandishing a proposal since 2012 that would remove some inspectors from the kill line while allowing the industry to speed them up to a rate of 175 birds per minute—a 25 percent acceleration. The speedup would likely increase reliance on those antimicrobial sprays to manage pathogens: In the USDA's proposal, "visibly contaminated poultry carcasses" would be allowed to remain on-line for treatment with germ-killing chemicals, instead of being taken offline for cleaning, as is the current practice. For companies that opt to keep their "visibly contaminated" birds on the kill line, "all carcasses" on the line would be doused with antimicrobial chemicals, the proposal states, "whether they are contaminated or not."
The US Department of Agriculture, which inspects the kill line at these plants, has been brandishing a proposal since 2012 that would remove some inspectors from the kill line while allowing the industry to speed them up to a rate of 175 birds per minute—a 25 percent acceleration. The speedup would likely increase reliance on those antimicrobial sprays to manage pathogens: In the USDA's proposal, "visibly contaminated poultry carcasses" would be allowed to remain on-line for treatment with germ-killing chemicals, instead of being taken offline for cleaning, as is the current practice. For companies that opt to keep their "visibly contaminated" birds on the kill line, "all carcasses" on the line would be doused with antimicrobial chemicals, the proposal states, "whether they are contaminated or not."
The department has delayed
finalizing the highly controversial new setup, but keeps stubbornly
repeating its intention to do so, eventually. As recently as April 3,
Brian Ronholm, acting under secretary for food safety, touted the plan before a House subcommittee.
Meanwhile, new information on the already-harsh conditions that prevail on the factory-slaughterhouse floor has emerged over the past month. On the chemical-spray front, the above video, from Atlanta's WSB-TV News, shows that some USDA inspectors in the southeast are complaining publicly that the antimicrobial sprays are causing them, as well as line workers, serious respiratory troubles. The Atlanta report builds on an excellent 2013 story by the Washington Post's Kimberly Kindy, who conducted interviews with more than two dozen USDA inspectors and poultry industry employees, and found a "range of ailments they attributed to chemical exposure, including asthma and other severe respiratory problems, burns, rashes, irritated eyes, and sinus ulcers and other sinus problems."
Stunningly, the USDA trotted that report out in defense of its speedup plan. The report, requested by the USDA itself, did find that carpal tunnel rates at the South Carolina plant did not rise 10 months after its line speed increased from 140 birds per minute to 170 birds per minute. In a triumphant March 26 blog post, Al Almanza, administrator of the department's USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service, hailed that result, declaring that NIOSH researchers had shown that "the increase in evisceration line speeds was not a significant factor in worker safety"—a statement he saw fit to underline for emphasis.
In a scathing April 7 retort, NIOSH director John Howard claimed that his agency's report drew "no such conclusion." He called the finding of carpal tunnel syndrome at a steady rate of 42 percent "alarming," adding that the 10 months between the researchers' two visits was "not sufficient to result in a change in health status."
Moreover, the plant didn't just speed up its line, it turns out. It combined two lines, each operating at 140 birds per minute, into a single one operating at 170 birds per minute—and kept all of the employees working on the combined line. That meant that "the number of chickens handled by most workers and the total production remained the same at the time of our follow-up visit," the report clearly states. Howard noted that because of the unusual arrangement, "no conclusion can be drawn" from the report about "the effect of line speed changes on worker health." This assessment was made clear in the report itself, which stated that "this plant may not be representative of all plants that may increase their evisceration line speed."
Yet the USDA is sticking by its creative reading of the NIOSH report. In an email to me, a USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service public affairs specialist reiterated that "increased line speed at this plant did not result in an increase in injuries" at the plant. The specialist added that the report "illustrates that a plant can adjust its processing so that increased line speeds do not necessarily lead to more birds being processed per worker, a fact FSIS has continued to point out." Fair enough. But FSIS has also repeatedly claimed that the sped-up system would benefit poultry processing companies to the tune of "at least" $256 million annually in reduced costs. It's hard to imagine where that cool quarter-billion in annual savings would come from, if not from each worker processing more birds per minute.
Finally, things have gotten so dire on the poultry line that three organizations—Nebraska Appleseed, the Midwest Coalition for Human Rights, and the Southern Poverty Law Center—appealed to the the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (part of the Organization of American States) for a hearing on the "Human Rights Situation of Workers in the Meatpacking and Poultry Industry in the United States," which was held on March 25. Drawing on SPLC's harrowing 2013 report compiling the complaints of poultry workers called "Unsafe at These Speeds," SPLC attorney Tom Fritzsche delivered blunt testimony (video here), calling on the USDA to abandon its new plan and instead slow down the kill lines. This bit from Fritzsche's testimony caught my attention: "The work speed is so unrelenting that it has forced workers to urinate and defecate in their clothing while working on the line because employers deny reasonable bathroom use, violating workers' rights to dignity."
Meanwhile, new information on the already-harsh conditions that prevail on the factory-slaughterhouse floor has emerged over the past month. On the chemical-spray front, the above video, from Atlanta's WSB-TV News, shows that some USDA inspectors in the southeast are complaining publicly that the antimicrobial sprays are causing them, as well as line workers, serious respiratory troubles. The Atlanta report builds on an excellent 2013 story by the Washington Post's Kimberly Kindy, who conducted interviews with more than two dozen USDA inspectors and poultry industry employees, and found a "range of ailments they attributed to chemical exposure, including asthma and other severe respiratory problems, burns, rashes, irritated eyes, and sinus ulcers and other sinus problems."
Poultry plant workers suffer from a "range
of ailments...including asthma and other severe respiratory problems,
burns, rashes, irritated eyes, and sinus ulcers and other sinus
problems," according to the Washington Post.
Than there's this March report by
the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health on a plant in
South Carolina operating at the current maximum speed of 140 birds per
minute, which found that 42 percent of the workers had carpal tunnel
syndrome, an extremely painful condition brought on by repetitive
motion.Stunningly, the USDA trotted that report out in defense of its speedup plan. The report, requested by the USDA itself, did find that carpal tunnel rates at the South Carolina plant did not rise 10 months after its line speed increased from 140 birds per minute to 170 birds per minute. In a triumphant March 26 blog post, Al Almanza, administrator of the department's USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service, hailed that result, declaring that NIOSH researchers had shown that "the increase in evisceration line speeds was not a significant factor in worker safety"—a statement he saw fit to underline for emphasis.
In a scathing April 7 retort, NIOSH director John Howard claimed that his agency's report drew "no such conclusion." He called the finding of carpal tunnel syndrome at a steady rate of 42 percent "alarming," adding that the 10 months between the researchers' two visits was "not sufficient to result in a change in health status."
Moreover, the plant didn't just speed up its line, it turns out. It combined two lines, each operating at 140 birds per minute, into a single one operating at 170 birds per minute—and kept all of the employees working on the combined line. That meant that "the number of chickens handled by most workers and the total production remained the same at the time of our follow-up visit," the report clearly states. Howard noted that because of the unusual arrangement, "no conclusion can be drawn" from the report about "the effect of line speed changes on worker health." This assessment was made clear in the report itself, which stated that "this plant may not be representative of all plants that may increase their evisceration line speed."
Yet the USDA is sticking by its creative reading of the NIOSH report. In an email to me, a USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service public affairs specialist reiterated that "increased line speed at this plant did not result in an increase in injuries" at the plant. The specialist added that the report "illustrates that a plant can adjust its processing so that increased line speeds do not necessarily lead to more birds being processed per worker, a fact FSIS has continued to point out." Fair enough. But FSIS has also repeatedly claimed that the sped-up system would benefit poultry processing companies to the tune of "at least" $256 million annually in reduced costs. It's hard to imagine where that cool quarter-billion in annual savings would come from, if not from each worker processing more birds per minute.
"The work speed is so unrelenting that it has forced workers to urinate and defecate in their clothing while working."
At any rate, the report shows definitively that even the current
maximum line speed is sufficient for generating "alarming" rates of
carpal tunnel among workers.Finally, things have gotten so dire on the poultry line that three organizations—Nebraska Appleseed, the Midwest Coalition for Human Rights, and the Southern Poverty Law Center—appealed to the the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (part of the Organization of American States) for a hearing on the "Human Rights Situation of Workers in the Meatpacking and Poultry Industry in the United States," which was held on March 25. Drawing on SPLC's harrowing 2013 report compiling the complaints of poultry workers called "Unsafe at These Speeds," SPLC attorney Tom Fritzsche delivered blunt testimony (video here), calling on the USDA to abandon its new plan and instead slow down the kill lines. This bit from Fritzsche's testimony caught my attention: "The work speed is so unrelenting that it has forced workers to urinate and defecate in their clothing while working on the line because employers deny reasonable bathroom use, violating workers' rights to dignity."
If You Liked This, You Might Also Like...
USDA Ruffles Feathers With New Poultry Inspection Policy
Faster kill lines will save Big Chicken a bundle. But are they safe for workers—or eaters?Obama's Plan to Stick It to Poultry Workers
Kill-line workers already routinely sustain hand injuries. In a boon to Big Poultry, the USDA wants to nearly double line speeds.Drug-Resistant E. Coli Rampant Among Poultry Workers
If you needed yet another reason to be grossed out by the American meat industry, consider this tantalizing tidbit: U.S. Poultry workers are much more likely than the average American—32 times more likely, in fact—to carry antibiotic-resistant E. coli bacteria, according to a Johns Hopkins study. With the recent news that drug-resistant staph infections are on the rise, most people I know have...What's Even Grosser Than Pink Slime?
USDA chief Tom Vilsack rallies around the dodgy meat filler while pushing a new policy that could mean more tainted poultry.Fewer Chicken Inspectors and More Chickens?
Yes please, says the USDA.THE below from Daily Kos......do you want chicken factories inspected by the poultry companies who own them—while feces-filled birds, doused with chemicals, zoom through the assembly line at three per second? That could be the future, if we don’t act now.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture is considering a rule change that would privatize poultry inspection—allowing companies to inspect chicken and turkey carcasses themselves.
What happens if birds are contaminated with feces? The rule allows companies to douse them with more chemicals, while jacking up assembly line speeds to three birds per second.USDA takes its bad idea of speeding up chicken inspection lines and makes it worse
The Obama administration Department of Agriculture has been pushing its proposal to "modernize" chicken processing inspection to include speeding up inspection lines and using fewer inspectors. They use the old excuse of saying it will save money and make the process more efficient.
attribution: USDA.gov
The USDA claims that it would save taxpayers $30 million per year by laying off inspectors, and save the poultry industry "at least" $256 million annually. The chicken industry—dominated by Tyson, Pilgrim's Pride (now mostly owned by JBS), Purdue, and Sanderson—strongly supports the proposal.
Of course, food safety and labor advocates are up in arms arguing that the combination of more speed and fewer inspectors would lead to dangerous conditions for both consumers and line workers. The faster inspection lines would make the various commonly found pathogens of salmonella and campylobacter, which are often antibiotic-resistant, more prevalent. But, don't worry, the USDA has a solution for that. They plan to unleash a barrage of anti-microbial sprays onto chicken carcasses as they zip down the line. Doesn't that make you feel better? The USDA is reviewing whether the bacteria-killing chemicals are actually masking salmonella rather than killing it.
However that turns out, looks like the USDA will go ahead with its "modernization" plans. What does the meat industry have that makes the USDA kowtow to their every wish? Why, of course, it has politicians in its pockets!Originally posted to beach babe in fl on Thu Dec 05, 2013 at 02:22 PM PST.
Also republished by Daily Kos.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/12/05/1260418/-USDA-takes-its-bad-idea-of-speeding-up-chicken-inspection-lines-and-makes-it-worse?detail=action
No comments:
Post a Comment